Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.
KMID : 1002720090070020011
Journal of Korean Proprioceptive Neuromuscular Facilitation Association
2009 Volume.7 No. 2 p.11 ~ p.20
The effect of Dynamic and Static PNF stretching on lower back flexibility
Choi Won-Jye

Cho Nam-Jeong
Kang Hee-Kwon
Kang Soo-Kyung
Kim Min-Jung
Kim Bung-Oh
Heo Soo-Yong
Yoo Byung-Kook
Lee Sam-Cheol
Son Kyung-Hyun
Abstract
Purpose£ºThe purpose of this study is to find out which method is efficient to enhance the flexibility of lower back between PNF(Proprioceptive Neuromuscular Facilitation), static and dynamic stretching.

Methods£ºSubjects were 30 young people between the ages 17 and 19. They were randomly divided into three groups; static group(n=10) performed a static stretching, dynamic group(n=10) performed a dynamic stretching, and PNF group(n=10) performed a PNF stretching. Intervention was provided 5 days per week for 4 weeks. For each case, Trunk flexion forward, trunk flexion backward, trunk left lateral bending, trunk right lateral bending, trunk flexion forward a measuring instrument and tapeline were performed to measured the flexibility of lower back at different times(before starting the exercise, after 4 weeks).

Results£ºThe results of the study reveal that the lower back flexibility was a statistically significant difference in all groups(p<.05). There was statistically significant difference between PNF group and static group, PNF group and dynamic group.

Conclusion£ºThe finding indicated that PNF may be preferred technique for improving flexibility, and that flexibility training results in an increased consistency of flexibility scores
KEYWORD
Static, Avtive, PNF, Flexibility, Stretching
FullTexts / Linksout information
Listed journal information
ÇмúÁøÈïÀç´Ü(KCI)